Psoriasis Treatment and Healthcare Resource Utilisation
By Melike Belenli Gümüş
August 14, 2024
Introduction
Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin condition affecting working-age individuals, primarily manifests as psoriasis vulgaris, constituting over 80% of cases. Psoriasis treatment and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) are critical topics in dermatology. Linked to various comorbidities like psoriatic arthritis and cardiovascular diseases, psoriasis imposes a substantial healthcare burden, particularly in Europe where it affects 1-5% of the population. Biologics targeting immune pathways have significantly advanced treatment, yet real-world data on HCRU patterns remain scarce.
Understanding Psoriasis Burden and Comorbidities
A retrospective study from Finland provided a comprehensive analysis of the real-world impact of biologic treatments on HCRU in psoriasis patients. In Finland, psoriasis treatment aligns with Current Care Guidelines, reserving biologics for severe cases unresponsive to initial therapies. The study analysed data from Finnish national health registers, focusing on patients who initiated biologic or conventional treatments between January 2013 and December 2017. The biologics included in the study were adalimumab, brodalumab, etanercept, secukinumab, ixekizumab, certolizumab pegol, and ustekinumab, as they are reimbursable for psoriasis treatment in Finland. Conventional treatments included cyclosporine, methotrexate, and acitretin. Biologic initiators, predominantly male, exhibited higher rates of immune-mediated comorbidities compared to conventional starters.
Key Findings
Reduction in Dermatology Visits
One of the most significant findings was the reduction in dermatology visits among biologic starters. The mean annual number of dermatologist contacts decreased from 5.4 to 2.3 per person after initiating biologic treatment. This reduction highlights the effectiveness of biologics in managing psoriasis, leading to fewer healthcare visits.
Impact on Primary and Secondary Care
While dermatology visits decreased, the mean annual number of primary care and other secondary care contacts slightly increased after starting biologics. Primary care contacts rose from 8.7 to 9.1 per person, and secondary care contacts increased from 3.9 to 4.1. These findings suggest that while biologics reduce the need for specialised dermatology care, they may lead to increased interactions with less costly healthcare providers.
Treatment Switching
Switching treatments, common in both groups, influenced HCRU differently. Approximately 32.3% of biologic starters and 19% of conventional starters switched treatments at least once during the observation period. Biologic switchers experienced milder peaks in dermatologist visits, indicating smoother transitions. Conversely, conventional switchers exhibited heightened dermatologist contacts pre-switch, suggesting unmet treatment needs. Notably, non-switching biologic users demonstrated lower overall HCRU compared to switchers, implying treatment continuity’s positive impact.
Limitations and Considerations
The study had several limitations, including a lack of detailed clinical information and the exclusion of private and occupational healthcare data. Besides, the analysis did not include drugs administered in hospitals, such as intravenous infliximab. Despite these limitations, the study provides valuable insights into the real-world impact of biologics on HCRU in psoriasis patients.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates the benefits of biologic treatments in reducing dermatology visits and highlights the importance of considering patient needs and preferences in psoriasis management. As the number of treatment options continues to grow, understanding the real-world impact of these treatments becomes increasingly important. The findings support the use of biologics to improve patient outcomes and reduce the burden on healthcare systems.
🚀 Discover how the AI-driven LabelComp tool is transforming drug safety surveillance! By automating the identification of adverse events in drug labelling, LabelComp enhances accuracy and efficiency, supporting regulatory decision-making and public health. 🌐💊 #SyenzaNews #AIinHealthcare #DrugSafety #PharmaInnovation #RegulatoryScience
🌟 School-based health centres (SBHCs) are improving healthcare for underserved youth across the US! These centres provide vital services, from preventive care to chronic disease management, right where students need them most – in schools. 📚🏥
SBHCs improve academic performance, reduce absenteeism, and enhance overall student well-being. Let’s support these essential centres and ensure every child has access to quality healthcare. 🌟
🌟 Exciting developments in Abu Dhabi! The Department of Health has introduced new ABA guidelines for Autism Spectrum Disorder, aiming to improve care for People of Determination. This initiative focuses on standardising care, enhancing accessibility, and fostering collaboration between healthcare and education professionals. Learn more about how these guidelines can make a difference in the lives of individuals with ASD. #SyenzaNews #HealthcareInnovation #AutismCare #InclusiveHealth #ABAGuidelines #AbuDhabiHealth
When you collaborate with VSH Foundation, it's like unlocking a new dimension in healthcare
innovation.
Our research synergizes with your vision, combining expertise in health economics, policy analysis, advanced
analytics, and AI applications in healthcare. You’ll witness the fusion of cutting-edge methodologies and real-
world impact, as we work together to transform healthcare systems and improve patient outcomes globally.